Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Cute as a Reset Button



Well, if giving a real barnburner of a speech is any measure, we sure got our money’s worth with President Obama’s first State of the Union message. The buzz leading up to it was that he was going to hit the reset button on his administration as a response to some of the reverses it has experienced in the last year. He did speak of “setbacks” for his administration, but is it simply enough to endearingly characterize the problems of the country? Obama did this very effectively during his campaign and yet managed to create an Everest of doubt in his sincerity even among his most fervid admirers. He has been the President for a year and for those who supported him his accomplishments appear few and far between.


Nonetheless, it is my impression that he renewed his lease on hope with this speech and gave some momentum to his administration leading up to the elections in November. That he is a consummate politician and wordsmith was further ratified by this performance. He called attention to the strength and the decency of the American people and accurately described the desperate plight of working America. A line such as “No one should go broke because they chose to go to college” was later followed by recognition that American business will be the ultimate engine of our recovery. There was meat thrown to tigers of all political stripes. Rousing applause and standing ovation came most often from the Democratic side of the audience and a stolid and studied indifference from the Republicans. As with all such presidential speeches, remarks were made of such a general and patriotic nature that ratifying applause was evident from all segments of the audience.

However, it was interesting to note that the Republicans could not be moved from their seats by President Obama’s acknowledgment that American people are strong and decent, maybe because that was placed in the context of their gallant response to the economic downturn. Everything is perspective and from mine, the Republican side of the chamber looked like a collection of 250 suits each with a sneer in its lapel. The sneerer-in-chief Eric Cantor, the House Republican Whip, was turned out in his best supercilious expression, with which, in fact, he may have been born. Thus, no special notice need be taken of it. In any case, Obama’s desire to continue to work bi-partisan magic or the Democrats’ general tendency to defer to their opposition may not succeed, especially with all the serious financial and social difficulties facing this nation.

We are a pragmatic people and want problems solved and business done. The structural problems built into our political system seem to work against finding solutions, particularly the need for super-majorities before legislation can be passed. I know of no other real democracy that hobbles itself in this way. A democratic republic should truly represent its people. Rural states have much more power than their numbers warrant and lobbyists have much more influence than honest government can abide. Of course, many parliamentary governments with numerous parties are equally hobbled; small parties often wield power much greater than their size because of their strategic situation.

It will be interesting to observe whether Obama is able to turn the current tide in his direction. He has not really departed from the standard narrative nor has his political behavior been startlingly new. Yet, he is characterized in outrageous terms bearing no relationship to any reality. The ambitions of the American global empire remain unamended. The Republicans did not even applaud when Obama called for companies to keep jobs in this country. The fortunes of their patrons ride on a much freer expression of capital, one in which the government in all the moves that it makes works to their financial benefit. People – didn’t you attend the corporate orientation meeting where it was all laid out? The business of America is business and the sooner you learn that the happier you’ll be, and if not there’s always Prozac.


1 comment:

  1. You worded this dead on but I think Obama has been playing the game. He has to constantly give in and give in to win somwhere. That is to say, his political capital cant be stretch among every iniative but when he does use it we must win. We used a ton on healthcare only to see that killed (even without the public option).

    I dont believe the country to a little center right but I do believe we have been indoctrinated froma young age to see America as exceptional and the American way the best. This naturally gives the right an advantage. Too easily can Obamas policies be attacked as un american or socialist, "big government" is the term the right uses. This causes his to HAVE to fight big battles and expend much more capital than he should to implement his policies.

    The funny thing is we overwhelmingly voted FOR CHANGE in 08. Yet voters in MASS are now pissed about healthcare being "shoved down their throat." WHAT THE HELL CHANGE DID YOU WANT? Now Obama is going after BIG BANKS and the CONCENTRATION OF WEALTH. WHich is detrimental to society. But again we hear it being called big government and socialist.

    The question should not be framed as "do you think the government has the right to interfere" the question we must ask ourselves is who do you want making these financial decisions? YOUR government OR private capital owners?

    Obama will have to make many consessions to fight the banks but we must show him we still want change.

    ReplyDelete

About Me

My photo
Springfield, Missouri, United States
I have been a professor of sociology at Missouri State University in Springfield for the past twenty years. My undergraduate degree is from Stanford University in Psychology and my graduate degree in sociology was obtained from the University of California, San Francisco. The sociology department at UCSF was dedicated to the study of medical sociology and took a strong symbolic interactionist perspective. My mentors were Virginia Olesen, Leonard Schatzman, and Anselm Strauss. Further biographic details may be discussed in the posts but this blog has as its purpose the discussion of issues that flow out of the study of political economy and the social and cultural life of our present world. I have called this blog "asimplecountrysociologist" because that collection of words carries with it the irony that I feel every day, embedded as I am in the American midwest.